My secretary came in this morning with some surprising news. Being an avid watcher of Channel 10 and understanding my plight for Stockton, she always has some news nugget pertaining to our City. This morning touched home a little more than the usual useless piece of knowledge. She said verbatim,
“Some guy was on talking really positive about Stockton because of some Forbes list
and he had like an internet show, or talk show, or something. I thought you would
like it because he is on the internet.”
I knew it could only be one guy, so I asked a few questions to see if I was correct.
“Was there a wily mexican guy that was full of positive energy?”
“Yes”
“Was there a short haired guy that looks like he belongs to the cult of Apple?”
:-| *(puzzled look from secretary)*
“Did the news refer to their show as an internet radio show?”
“Yes, yes they did”
“Eureka it must be Podcast Stockton” (I might not have said this)
The last questions were just small inside jokes for an audience of nerds, but I confirmed that the netcast, (we will talk about this later), in question was none other than Podcast Stockton.
Congratulations to Matt and Rod, for being positive and making it great. These guys are proof that positivity will prevail and success is not monetary, but lies within. Why else would two guys that haven’t made a dime for their efforts continue to produce a product that is better each time. If they were a wine they would be a Bordeaux. More importantly if they were a beer, they would be a Gueuze from Cantillon, a beer that completely and consciously transcends any idea that you might have of beer. You see a Gueze takes three years to even be classified as a Gueze, from that point forward the taste only becomes that which legends are written about.
Bottom line, if you don’t listen, you probably should.
Click here to see Podcast Stockton on Channel 10
Click here to see Podcast Stockton on Channel 3
(ps I hate myself for putting “Click here”, but since only my grandparents read this, I have to spell it out for them)
If we are keeping score, I think News 10 did a far better job with the story than the cold Channel 3 in studio plug. The footie of the “outback studio” added a warmth to the story that the frigid studio of Channel 3 couldn’t muster. Also it just seems that Channel 10 cared more because they sent a reporter. Channel 3 invited them to the studio, while nice, its just not personal. Personal works in human interest. Just my opinion, yes I still have it. Enter trolls.
Stay fresh.